 |
 |
|
|
|
 NYRR Message Boards
 Fast-Women
 NCAA Coverage (Page 2)
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: NCAA Coverage |
|
RQ Member Posts: 75 |
posted 11-22-2004 11:50 AM
   
Official Results 1st Colorado 63 IP: Logged |
|
frojoe23 Junior Member Posts: 3 |
posted 11-22-2004 11:51 AM
GO WVU!!! IP: Logged |
|
RQ Member Posts: 75 |
posted 11-22-2004 11:53 AM
Going to the Men'S BOARD for the race Temperature is up to 50 degrees IP: Logged |
|
kmclean Junior Member Posts: 1 |
posted 11-22-2004 11:59 AM
quote: Nice coverage. Wommack is from UTC and is the first XC All American for the Mocs. IP: Logged |
|
RetiredRunner Junior Member Posts: 23 |
posted 11-22-2004 12:18 PM
All-american is top 35...right? IP: Logged |
|
madonna Member Posts: 99 |
posted 11-22-2004 12:21 PM
30 overall + the first 30 Americans. Usually somewhere around 38-40
quote: IP: Logged |
|
whynotrun Junior Member Posts: 1 |
posted 11-22-2004 02:14 PM
Kudos to DUKE! Way under-rated all year. Incredible effort by a very deep team! IP: Logged |
|
calxc2006 Junior Member Posts: 3 |
posted 11-22-2004 02:30 PM
What happened to stanford? IP: Logged |
|
madonna Member Posts: 99 |
posted 11-22-2004 03:40 PM
FYI - it was nice to have Slattery back on the Colorado team, but they still would have won without her, that's how bad they spanked the rest of the field. IP: Logged |
|
RetiredRunner Junior Member Posts: 23 |
posted 11-22-2004 03:42 PM
Duke also ran without Laura Stanley. Anyone know why? Is she hurt? IP: Logged |
|
runnerchic Member Posts: 208 |
posted 11-23-2004 09:56 AM
Was your 5K split for Smith right? 15:49? Then did she really slow down to a 4:18 for the last 1K?? I believed the 5K split because she is amazing, but I was surprised she wasn't under 20. Several people were the other year that they held this thing at Terre Haute. IP: Logged |
|
Alison Administrator Posts: 1308 |
posted 11-23-2004 10:35 AM
quote: The course conditions were totally different this time. It was very muddy/wet. Last time it was significantly colder, but the ground was firm. No one seemed particularly convinced that Smith was running all-out either, but with dry conditions, I imagine there would have been a bunch under 20. IP: Logged |
|
pjm Member Posts: 930 |
posted 11-23-2004 12:38 PM
quote: Stanley was there, and while she was (obviously) not racing, she was on her feet and moving around pretty well. It's entirely possible that she's injured, but if so, it's not a "stay off your feet to let it heal" injury. IP: Logged |
|
dukerunner2008 Junior Member Posts: 1 |
posted 11-23-2004 01:59 PM
Originally posted by RetiredRunner: Duke also ran without Laura Stanley. Anyone know why? Is she hurt? originally posted by pjm: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IP: Logged |
|
RetiredRunner Junior Member Posts: 23 |
posted 11-23-2004 02:36 PM
Thats too bad about Laura. They would have done even better with her! IP: Logged |
|
pjm Member Posts: 930 |
posted 11-23-2004 07:46 PM
quote: They might have put some more distance on Providence, but they would need to have found eighty-one points to catch Colorado, which wouldn't have happened even if Stanley had run and won. It must have been tough for her to watch and not race, but she couldn't have changed the team finish order (unlike another injured scorer, Sara Bei - only eleven points between Stanford in fifth and Providence in third.) I think Duke will demand attention at the start of next year's season; Colorado loses bigger points than they do. IP: Logged |
|
madonna Member Posts: 99 |
posted 11-23-2004 11:58 PM
Colorado could have scored 6 runners and still would have won.
quote: IP: Logged |
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2 All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
|
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d